14 August 2023

Fossil fuel producers on course to badly overshoot climate targets, finds new tracking tool

Estimated reading time: 2 Minutes

More than half of the world’s top fossil fuel producers will badly overshoot climate targets unless they ramp up their decarbonisation actions, according to an international team including the University of Oxford.

Without a serious course correction, the research found that 142 of the largest fossil fuel companies could exceed their collective production budgets for oil, gas, and coal by up to 42%, 53%, and 68% respectively by 2050, if their historical growth trends continue.

It also found that all five of the biggest coal companies overshot their individual carbon budgets before 2021.

The research authors – from the University of Queensland, Oxford University’s Institute for New Economic Thinking and Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, Princeton University, and the Climate Accountability Institute – developed a new method to track fossil fuel producers’ compliance with the Paris Agreement using publicly available data.

The study uses average growth data from 2010-2018 to predict the long-term trajectory of companies’ oil and gas production, and compares this to a Paris-compliant production ‘budget’ to 2050. The details of their methodology were published today in Nature Climate Change.

“Phrases like ‘Paris aligned’ and ‘Paris compliant’ are being thrown around everywhere right now,” said Dr Saphira Rekker, assistant professor of sustainable finance at the University of Queensland and the study’s lead author. “But if we don’t have a robust and reliable way of assessing progress, those phrases don’t actually mean anything.”

The researchers’ new method expands on their original approach, which measured the Paris compliance of utility and cement companies.

Dr Matthew Ives from the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, said the new method – based on absolute fossil fuel production – would make it more difficult for companies to get away with greenwashing.

“Some existing approaches have used metrics like carbon intensity that rely on difficult-to-source and often misleading data,” Dr Ives said. “Other approaches have enabled companies to choose their own starting point for tracking progress, allowing them to erase unflattering historical emissions. 

“With our approach, anyone and everyone can evaluate fossil fuel companies for their Paris compliance – it’s much more straightforward.

“We have got to get past the practice of simply announcing climate targets and moving on with business as usual,” said co-author Professor Chris Greig, Senior Research Scientist at the Princeton’s Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment. “When you announce a commitment, you really should have a credible plan to deliver. You must always be thinking about the future, even when it lies beyond the likely tenure of executives and directors.”

Dr Rekker said there were many pathways to Paris compliance, so the aim of the research wasn’t to lecture the companies and sectors studied about the right and wrong ways to operate.

“Our tool also gives executives and other stakeholders a sense of the transition and reputational risks they might face if they overshoot their production budgets and don’t course correct,” she said.

Companies, policymakers, shareholders and the public can visit the researchers’ Are You Paris Compliant website to access the company ratings and assessment tools.