Photo: IWMI Flickr Photos

Climate Science and Law

Overview

Our climate science and law group, led by Dr Rupert Stuart-Smith, conducts scientific and legal research that can inform law and policy. Our work brings clarity to states' and corporates’ legal duties in the context of climate change by quantifying climate change impacts, clarifying mitigation pathways consistent with legal duties, and shedding light on the financial risks associated with climate-related legal action. We work with partners to understand emerging evidentiary questions that arise in climate lawsuits and policy development. Our research is defined by its independence and interdisciplinarity and includes cutting-edge analyses of states’ legal duties to mitigate climate change and the impacts of climate change on health, agriculture and the economy.

Our current research focus areas are:

  • Health attribution: We use methods from climate science, epidemiology and physiology to shed light on the impacts of climate change. Our work on health attribution includes participation in multi-year research initiatives: TACTIC and Visibilize4ClimateAction (with funding from the Wellcome Trust). Our research quantifies the present and future burdens of climate change on health, including from vector-borne disease and heat-related mortality.
  • Climate change impacts: We conduct groundbreaking research on the agricultural and economic impacts of climate change. We also conduct scientifically-informed legal research on causation in climate-related lawsuits.
  • Mitigation: How quickly should countries reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet their Paris Agreement commitments equitably? The answer to this fundamental question is not known precisely, an issue of critical policy and legal uncertainty. Our research clarifies the mitigation action needed by states if they are to act in concert with norms and principles of international law.
  • Financial impact of legal action: litigation and regulatory enforcement action constitutes a growing financial risk to firms. However, these risks are rarely disclosed, and their impacts on companies are poorly understood. Our research addresses this gap.

Our work

Our work integrates climate science with legal research and practice. We actively collaborate with scientists from a range of different disciplines to shed light on the health, economic and agricultural impacts of climate change worldwide. We also research how legal causation analyses can respond to recent developments in attribution science and opportunities to use the latest scientific evidence in courts.

The growth in legal action around climate change offers opportunities to accelerate the transition to a net-zero economy but the financial implications of climate litigation remain poorly understood. We work with regulators, private-sector actors and leading academics across the University of Oxford and beyond to assess, quantify, and reveal the materiality of these risks.

What we've achieved

Recent research highlights

  • United Nations Environment Programme (2026). Limiting Overshoot: Navigating exceedance of 1.5°C and pathways towards return. Nairobi. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/49857
  • Stuart-Smith, R.F., Wetzer, T. (2026). The narrowing legal operating space for climate action. The British Medical Journal 392:r2498 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r2498
  • Rajamani, L., White, E., Rogelj, J., Prütz, R., Wetzer, T., Wood, M., & Stuart-Smith, R. F. (2026). Legal guardrails on states’ dependence on carbon dioxide removal to meet climate targets. Climate Policy, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2599861
  • Al Khourdaji, A., Andrijevic, M., Byers, E., Pathak, M., Pirani, A., Schleussner, C.F., Stuart-Smith, R.F. (2026). Overshoot pathways: reversible biophysical change, irreversible socioeconomic impacts. Environmental Research Letters 21, 164002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae96c9
  • Undorf, S., Dimitrova, A., Harrington, L.J., Hegerl, G., Jézéquel, A., Kimutai, J., Lo, Y.T.E., Mengel, M., Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S., Pietroiusti, R., Pinto, I., Schurer, A., Scussolini, P., Sippel, S., Stone, D., Stuart-Smith, R.F., et al. (2026). Approaches, challenges and applications of climate change impact attribution. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 7, 469-488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00798-8
  • Lisi, G., Stuart-Smith, R.F. (2025). Medical evidence drove legal action to clean up the air we breathe, climate justice may be next. The British Medical Journal 391, r1568. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r1568
  • Stuart-Smith, R.F., White, E., Prütz, R.M., Rogelj, J., Wetzer, T., Wood, M., Rajamani, L. (2025). Implications of states’ dependence on carbon dioxide removal for achieving the Paris temperature goal. Climate Policy. 1–16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2025.2528775
  • Carlson, C.J., Gibb, R.J., Mitchell, D., Stuart-Smith, R.F., … Trisos, C.H. (2025). Health losses attributable to anthropogenic climate change. Nature Climate Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02399-7
  • Ebi, K., Haines, A., … Stuart-Smith, R. F.  (2025) The attribution of human health outcomes to climate change: a transdisciplinary guidance document. Climatic Change, 178, 143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03976-7
  • Wetzer, T., Stuart-Smith, R.F., & Dibley, A. (2024). Climate-related risk assessments must engage with the law. Science, 383(6679), 152-154. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adj0598
  • Stuart-Smith, R.F., Rajamani, L., Rogelj, J., Wetzer, T. (2023). Legal limits to the use of CO2 removal to meet climate goals. Science, 382(6672), 772-774. https://www.science.org/stoken/author-tokens/ST-1557/full
  • Stuart-Smith, R. F., Otto, F. E. L., & Wetzer, T. (2024). Liability for Climate Change Impacts: the Role of Climate Attribution Science. In E. de Jong (Ed.), Corporate Accountability and Liability for Climate Change (pp. 205–233). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035333226
  • Clarke, B. J., Otto, F. E. L., Stuart-Smith, R. F., & Harrington, L. J. (2022). Extreme weather impacts of climate change: an attribution perspective. Environmental Research: Climate, 1(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ac6e7d
  • Stuart-Smith, R.F., Otto, F.E.L., Saad, A., Lisi, G., Minnerop, P., Lauta, K.C., van Zwieten, K., & Wetzer, T.  (2021). Filling the evidentiary gap in climate litigation. Nature Climate Change, 11. Report for practitioners available in English and Spanish.
  • Stuart-Smith, R.F., Roe, G.H., Li, S. and Allen, M.R. (2021) Increased outburst flood hazard from Lake Palcacocha due to human-induced glacier retreat. Nature Geoscience, 14: 85-90.
  • Sofia De Jong | Visiting Student

Contact us

If you have any questions about this workstream, would like to learn more, or want to get involved: please contact Rupert Stuart-Smith. For general questions about the programme please email Oxford Sustainable Law Programme information.